The Evolution of the Concept of God: From Primal Lightning to the Free Universe

The Evolution of the Concept of God: From Primal Lightning to the Free Universe

The concept of God or gods is one of the oldest main pillars of human civilization. Along with the development of intellect and social structure, human understanding of this supreme power continues to evolve. From the raw power of nature to abstract, invisible entities, the journey of the concept of divinity reflects the spiritual and intellectual history of humanity.

Spiritual Dawn: Natural Forces and Formless Supernatural Power (Prehistory – c. 2000 BCE)

In the earliest stages of civilization, early humans often associated God or gods with forces controlling nature that were fierce and mysterious. The concepts known as Dynamism and Animism saw spirits or sacred power (mana) residing in objects or natural phenomena such as lightning, volcanoes, rivers, or large trees. Lightning was not just a natural phenomenon, but a manifestation of divine anger or power. In this view, what was worshipped was not a figure, but the essence of power, often considered formless, that controlled destiny.

The Classical Era: Anthropomorphic Gods (c. 2000 BCE – 300 CE)

Great civilizations brought radical changes in how the gods were viewed. In the Greek Era (c. 800 BCE – 146 BCE), the gods of Olympus, such as Zeus (God of Thunder and Sky), Apollo, and Hera, were depicted in human form (anthropomorphism) with all their emotions, conflicts, and even offspring. They were a divine family, with Zeus as the king of the gods who had divine children. In this polytheistic pantheon, the existence of many gods was absolute, each controlling specific aspects of life. This concept is generally Polytheism, with a large number of gods (a pantheon). This concept was then widely adopted and assimilated by Ancient Rome (c. 509 BCE – 476 CE), where the Greek gods were given Latin names (e.g., Zeus became Jupiter, Ares became Mars). Roman religion often focused on the gods’ function as protectors of the state and the military, but the essence of the gods being human-like and interconnected was maintained. In Ancient Egypt (c. 3100 BCE – 30 BCE), another great civilization developed a unique concept of gods, often in the form of human and animal hybrids (e.g., Ra, the sun god, with a human body and the head of a falcon, or Anubis, the god of the dead, with the head of a jackal). Their belief was polytheistic with a large pantheon of gods, although for a period (the Akhenaten era, c. 1353–1336 BCE), monolatry, or the exclusive worship of one god, Aten, briefly emerged.

Sacred Texts and Incarnations (c. 1500 BCE – 1st Century CE)

In Ancient India (Hinduism), the concept of god developed into a complex system where the Supreme God (Brahman) manifests through many deities. Major deities such as the Trimurti (Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva) are often depicted in human form or have earthly manifestations (avatara). In mythology, gods can have human offspring, such as Karna (the son of the Sun God, Surya) or Puntadewa/Yudhisthira (the son of the God of Dharma, Yama) in the Mahabharata epic, indicating a blood relationship between the divine and the human. A major shift towards the strict concept of Monotheism emerged from Ancient Israel (Judaism) (c. 1500 BCE onwards). Their God, Yahweh (or YHWH), is an invisible and transcendent entity, not represented by a physical form, a Single, All-Powerful force. He is the Creator who transcends nature and demands strict morality. In this era, the concept of a spiritual antagonist also emerged, namely Satan or Iblis (the Devil), who is the enemy of man and opposes the will of God.

Assimilation and the Single Concept (1st Century CE – 7th Century CE)

After the crucifixion of Jesus, the Post-Jesus Era (1st Century CE onwards) was marked by the spread of teachings rooted in Jewish Monotheism, but which underwent significant assimilation with the surrounding cultures, especially Greek philosophy and Roman culture. The concept of the Trinity (Father, Son, Holy Spirit) began to be formalized. This concept, which affirms that Jesus is the Son of God and is consubstantial with the Father (established at the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD), is considered a result of Roman cultural assimilation, as the Romans were accustomed to the concept of human-shaped gods and a tripartite set of main deities. In Christianity, God remains invisible, but has a ‘Son’ who incarnates as a man (Jesus). Leading up to 0–600 AD in Pre-Islamic Arabia, polytheism was still strong. The Quraysh community in Mecca worshipped many idols, including three main deities often called the “Daughters of Allah”: Al-Latta, Al-Uzza, and Manat. They were worshipped as intermediaries to Allah, who was considered the supreme god. However, in the Islamic Era (circa 610 AD and beyond), a purification of the Monotheistic teaching emerged. Islam asserts the concept of Tawhid (The Oneness of God) as absolute. Allah (God) is Invisible and Transcendent, not in human form, has no children (as this contradicts His oneness), and there is nothing similar to Him (the concept of Laisa kamitslihi syai’un). This concept rejects all forms of anthropomorphism and divine offspring.

Modern Abstraction: Non-Institutional Spirituality (17th Century – Present)

In the last two centuries, amid advances in science and philosophy, the concept of God has shifted again in the Western world. The emergence of Deism (17th–18th Century) positions God as the Great Architect (Watchmaker) of the universe who has established the laws of nature and then no longer intervenes (non-intervening) in world affairs. God exists, but is not bound by revelation or specific religious dogma. This concept continues to become “Freelance Monotheism” or spirituality that is unattached. In the eyes of some, God is the Universe or a cosmic force that governs all things (as in modern Pantheism or Panentheism). Individuals believe in the existence of a Single divine entity, but they are not bound by institutional religion, choosing their own spiritual path outside the confines of traditional dogma.

The evolution of the concept of divinity shows that human belief is not static, but a dynamic reflection of the search for meaning, power, and order in an ever-changing reality. From the feared power of lightning to the freely acknowledged Universe, this journey is an eternal saga between humanity and the Supreme Mystery.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Killing Me Softly: Has Google “Killed” its Blogspot Son?

Killing Me Softly: Apakah Google Secara Halus “Membunuh” Putra Kandungnya, Blogger?

Has Google “Killed” its Blogspot Son?

The story of Google and Blogger (Blogspot.com) is a classic internet tragedy—or perhaps, a case study in corporate focus shift. Born from the heady days of the dot-com phenomenon and adopted by the burgeoning content giant, the free blogging platform once represented the democratization of the web. Today, for many original users, it feels like a beloved child slowly neglected by its dominant parent. The prevailing sentiment is that Google, having channeled its energy into more profitable and video-centric ventures like YouTube, has allowed its pioneering text-based son to slowly fade from the public eye.


The Golden Age: Blogspot’s Rise (2000-2010)

The early 2000s marked a creative explosion online. Following the dot-com bust, the internet matured into a space for personal expression, not just business. Google’s acquisition of Blogger in 2003 positioned it perfectly to ride the wave of personal publishing.

By the mid-2000s, millions flocked to Blogspot and its main competitor, WordPress. A simple Google account was all that was needed to set up a free blog with a https://www.google.com/search?q=yourname.blogspot.com subdomain. It was the perfect entry point for hobbyists, niche writers, and everyday people sharing everything from recipes to political rants. These blogs were the backbone of Google’s search index, feeding the crawler with a near-infinite stream of long-form, text-rich content. The relationship was symbiotic: Google got the content, and Blogspot users got visibility on the world’s fastest-growing search engine.


The De-Indexing Enigma: The Slow Decline (2015-2025)

The shift began subtly but became noticeable for veteran bloggers in the mid-2010s. The core complaint from Blogspot users today is the perceived de-indexing of their old content. Many report that out of 100 published posts, only a handful—sometimes as few as two to five—remain indexed and visible on Google’s Search Engine Results Pages (SERPs).

While Google officially maintains that it indexes the entire web and doesn’t explicitly penalize Blogspot, the reality experienced by users suggests a strong algorithmic preference shift. Several factors contributed to this:

  1. The Rise of YouTube: As Google’s other acquisition, YouTube, matured, video became the preferred format for many searches. Google began prioritizing video results, often placing them above traditional text blogs. This directly diverted traffic and attention away from written blog content.
  2. Algorithm Updates: Google’s continuous updates (like Panda, Penguin, and Core Updates) increasingly focused on “quality,” “authority,” and “freshness.” Many older, often unmaintained Blogspot sites, regardless of their historical value, were pushed down by newer, more professionally hosted (and often WordPress-based) websites with superior SEO, complex features, and better-structured content.
  3. Content Saturation: The sheer volume of content on the web today means Google has to be ruthlessly selective. A post on a free platform without strong domain authority or regular updates is more likely to be deemed “stale” or “low-quality” than it was a decade ago.

The result is a phenomenon that feels like a “soft killing” of Blogspot. The platform still exists, but its once guaranteed visibility has evaporated, leaving many old blogs in a digital graveyard, technically alive but rarely found.


The New Threats: TikTok and AI (2024-2025)

The digital landscape is changing faster than ever, presenting new, existential threats to Google’s traditional dominance:

  • TikTok’s Deflation of YouTube: While YouTube was once the prime challenger to text-based search, the rise of TikTok (and the subsequent growth of YouTube Shorts) has shifted consumer preference towards ultra-short-form, visual content. Gen Z, in particular, often uses these social platforms as a primary search engine for product reviews, travel tips, and “how-to” advice—bypassing both Google Search and long-form YouTube videos entirely.
  • The AI Revolution: Generative AI tools like ChatGPT and Google’s own AI Overviews (SGE) are changing how people consume information. Users are increasingly getting instant, synthesized answers from the AI without ever clicking through to an external website. This fundamentally disrupts the ad-driven, click-based business model that both traditional blogging and Google’s SERP rely upon. The competition is no longer just other websites; it’s the search engine itself.

In this context, Blogspot, already on the back burner, struggles to find relevance in a world demanding immediacy, video, or conversational AI summaries.


The Resurrection Rumor: Is Blogspot Coming Back?

The final question addresses the rumor of Google resurrecting Blogger/Blogspot.

No, there is no strong, official evidence or credible industry buzz to suggest a major “resurrection” of Blogspot/Blogger in 2024-2025 in a way that would restore its past glory.

Blogger still exists, is still free, and Google still maintains it with minor, infrequent updates. It will likely continue to function because it is cost-effective to host and represents a vast archive of content, which Google would be loath to simply delete. However, Google’s focus remains squarely on its highly profitable core products: Search, Ads, Cloud, and YouTube, all of which are now heavily invested in competing with AI and short-form video.

The most probable future for Blogspot is that it will remain a quiet, functional platform for hobbyists and niche communities who prioritize simplicity and free hosting over advanced features and search visibility. It’s a relic of the early internet, a digital backwater in the face of today’s content giants. The soft killing is not a sudden execution, but a long, slow marginalization—a quiet farewell to an era of unpolished, personal internet publishing.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Best Deals in October 2025: Buy a .COM Domain for Under USD 5 dan USD 7 in the First Year

If you’re launching a website, blog, or online business, one of the first steps is registering a domain name. The .COM extension is still king: it’s familiar, trustworthy, and easy to remember. Fortunately, there are registrars offering .COM domains for under USD 7 for the first year. Here’s a comparative guide and tips.

  • “Best Deals: Buy a .COM Domain for Under USD 7 in the First Year”
  • “Good Bargain! Buy a .COM Domain for Under USD 7 (First Year) “
  • “Cheap .COM Domains – Top Registrars Under USD 7 (First Year)”
  • “How to Get a .COM Domain for Less Than USD 7 – Best 2025 Deals”
  • “Buy a .COM Domain Name Under USD 7 – DreamHost, Namecheap, IDwebhost & More”
  • “Affordable .COM Domains: Best Bargains Under USD 7 for Your First Year”

Top Registrars with .COM Under USD 7 (First Year)

  1. DreamHost
    DreamHost currently offers .COM domains at USD 4.99 for the first year (including free private registration). DreamHost+3DreamHost+3tldes.com+3 This makes it one of the lowest priced options among well-known registrars.
  2. IDwebhost
    For users in Indonesia, IDwebhost sells .COM domains at USD 6 (≈ IDR 99,000) for the first year. (This was your earlier mention.)
  3. Namecheap
    Namecheap offers .COM registration at USD 6.49 for the first year. Namecheap That’s a solid balance between price and service quality.
  4. Dynadot
    Dynadot’s introductory .COM registration is USD 6.99, which just meets the under-USD 7 threshold. (Standard practice for Dynadot intro pricing.)
  5. SeekaHost
    A lesser-known registrar, SeekaHost advertises .COM “as little as USD 5.99” for new registrations. SeekaHost.app | This can be a viable option if you confirm availability and legitimacy.
  6. Others from price-comparison listings
    Tools like TLD-List or tldes.com list many registrars offering .COM in the USD 5.80–USD 7 range. tld-list.com+2tld-list.com+2 Using those lists, you may find promotional or lesser-known registrars with competitive offers. Always check the renewal price, domain management features, and reputation.

What to Watch Out For

  • Renewal price
    Introductory low price doesn’t always last. Many registrars raise .COM renewal fees significantly (e.g. from USD 5 to USD 15+). Always check the renewal rate before committing.
  • Whois privacy / domain privacy
    Some registrars include free WHOIS privacy; others charge extra. DreamHost, for example, includes free private registration. DreamHost
  • Hidden fees and upsells
    Be cautious of add-ons like “premium DNS,” “email forwarding,” “SSL certificates,” or “domain locking” which may add cost.
  • Reputation and support
    A cheap domain is only useful if the registrar is reliable, responsive, and stable. Stick with registrars known in the community (Namecheap, Dynadot, DreamHost) unless you thoroughly research a lesser one.

Final Thoughts

If your goal is to get a .COM domain for under USD 7 for your first year, your top candidates are:

  • DreamHost at USD 4.99
  • IDwebhost at USD 6 (IDR99,000)
  • Namecheap at USD 6.49
  • Dynadot at USD 6.99
  • SeekaHost at USD 5.99 (check legitimacy)

Beyond price, also compare renewal fees, domain control panel, privacy features, and customer support. Getting a low-cost domain is great — but the long-term experience matters more.

Read more:

Here’s a comparative table of the registrars you asked about, showing introductory price (first year), estimated renewal price, and pros / caveats. Use this to help pick the one that fits your strategy best.


RegistrarIntro Price (First Year)Renewal Price*Pros / Notes / Caveats
DreamHostUSD 4.99 for .COMUSD 19.99/year for .COM DreamHost+2tldes.com+2+ Includes free WHOIS privacy for life with domain. DreamHost+1
– Renewal is much higher than intro, so the cost jumps in year 2.
– They promise to honor the quoted renewal rate if it increases after you get the renewal notice. help.dreamhost.com+1
IDwebhostUSD 6 (≈ IDR 99,000) (promo)~ IDR 209,900 (≈ USD ~13-15, depending exchange) for renewal as listed on their site IDwebhost+2domain.idwebhost.com+2+ Very competitive for Indonesia market.
+ Local support and billing in IDR.
– Renewal is significantly more expensive than the promo year.
– Check if there are additional costs (WHOIS privacy, transfer, etc.).
NamecheapUSD 6.49 (for new customers) Namecheap+1Regular renewal ~ USD 16.98 for .COM (or more) Themeisle+1+ Strong reputation, good user interface, solid support.
+ Free domain privacy “for life” on many domains.
– The low intro rate is limited (new customer, one domain).
– Renewal jump is noticeable.
DynadotUSD 6.99 (promo) DynadotRegular ~ USD 10.88 renewal for .COM (as per their published standard rate) Dynadot+ Transparent pricing for many years.
+ Good domain management tools.
– The promo is limited; you must check the conditions.
– Renewal is still moderate, but lower than DreamHost’s jump.
Other Registrar (example: SeekaHost / smaller registrars)Possibly USD ~5.99 (promo) (varies)Depends heavily on registrar; many raise > 2×+ You might find new or niche registrars offering ultra-low intro prices.
– Risk: support, reliability, hidden fees, poor reputation, high renewal or hidden renewal rules.
– Always read the TOS and check renewal/transfer costs before committing.

* Renewal prices are based on public data at the time of writing; they are subject to change.


What to Watch Out For

  • Big renewal hikes: Many registrars offer a low “hook” rate for year 1, then sharply increase in year 2 onward (e.g. DreamHost’s jump from USD 4.99 to USD 19.99).
  • Privacy / WHOIS protection: Some registrars include WHOIS privacy free; others charge separately. Be sure to check.
  • Promo constraints: Intro offers often are limited to new customers, one domain, coupon codes, etc.
  • Hidden & additional fees: Domain transfer-out, domain locking, DNS, premium DNS, or “redemption” (if domain expires) fees can add costs.
  • Registrar reliability & support: A cheap domain is less valuable if you can’t get support or your registrar is unstable.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Shocking Cheap Web Hosting Plans Under $25 for Your First Year

Current shared-hosting offers in the ~US$10–25 first-year range and included the exact providers / links you asked for. Below I list plans that meet (or are very close to) your budget, plus the user-requested hosts even if a given plan is slightly outside the band — with sources for the price info.

Notes: first-year prices often depend on promotions, coupon codes, and billing term (1 year vs multi-year). I cite the pages I checked; if you want I can open a specific checkout URL and capture the exact cart price for 1-year billing.

“List of Super Cheap Web Hosting Offers (Only $10–$25 Annually for the First Year)”

“Top Budget Web Hosting Deals: $10–$25 per Year in the First Year”

“Shocking Cheap Web Hosting Plans Under $25 for Your First Year”

“Affordable Web Hosting Offers: Just $10–$25 Annually (First-Year Deals)”

“Best Cheap Web Hosting Providers from $10 to $25 for the First Year”

Quick table — Budget US$10 → US$25 (first year)

(links point to the page I checked; I cite sources after the table)

ProviderPlan / first-year price (approx.)Short notes
Serverbyt / ServerVyt (user link)~US$6.00 / year (cheap entry plan shown on serverbyt.com). ServerbytVery low introductory price (single-site / entry plan). Use your product link to confirm exact features for that PID.
Asura HostingUS$12.00 / year (Starter plan — $1.00/mo shown → $12/yr). Asura HostingStarter plan fits your budget (cPanel/DirectAdmin options).
CreemHost~US$15–$20 / year (starts at $1.33/mo on site → ≈$15.96/yr; site shows promotional pricing). creemhost.comCloud hosting with cPanel, LiteSpeed claims; promo pricing visible on main web hosting page.
AccuWebHostingUS$1.99/mo → US$23.88/yr (GoSolo plan shown at $1.99/mo). AccuWeb HostingAccuWeb lists a low $1.99/mo tier (global datacenter choices including Singapore and Mumbai). Good for picking a closer DC.
iPage (popular budget host)
No Longer Accept New User
≈US$1.99/mo → ≈US$23.88/yr (common promo) — verify at checkout.Widely used cheap host — price often promotional. (I can fetch current checkout price if you want.)
Namecheap (requested link)Varies — Namecheap’s Stellar plans are frequently shown around $2.98/mo to $2.99/mo (which can be ~US$35/yr) or they run different promos; checkout page needs dynamic pricing. Namecheap+1You included the Namecheap purchase URL — many Namecheap promos push yearly > $25 for Stellar, so double-check the cart for 1-yr price.
Hostinger (popular, widely used)Often $1.99–$3.99/mo promo → typically >$25/yr for 1-year billing (so usually slightly above your $25 cap). HostingerExcellent value but 1-year price often exceeds $25; longer terms lower monthly cost.

Sources I used (most load-bearing)

  • Asura Hosting plans/prices (Starter $1.00/mo = $12/yr). Asura Hosting
  • Serverbyt / ServerVyt pricing page (low $6/yr entry shown). Serverbyt
  • CreemHost web hosting page (starts at $1.33/mo promo). creemhost.com
  • AccuWebHosting web hosting plans (GoSolo $1.99/mo → $23.88/yr; global DC list incl. Singapore, Mumbai). AccuWeb Hosting
  • Namecheap shared hosting / Stellar overview & checkout page (dynamic pricing; I opened your purchase link). Namecheap+1

Recommendations & next steps

  • If you want strictly ≤ US$25 first-year, best immediate matches from above: Serverbyt (~$6/yr), Asura ($12/yr), CreemHost (~$16/yr), AccuWeb (with 1-yr = ~$23.88). I included Namecheap/Hostinger because they’re popular — but check the cart for their current 1-yr promotional price (often above $25).
  • Tell me which features matter most (disk type/size, number of sites, email, LiteSpeed, datacenter location, backups), and I’ll rank/sort these offers by your priorities.
  • If you want, I can open each provider’s checkout and capture the exact 1-year total (including taxes / required add-ons) for a definitive comparison.
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Shocking Cheap Web Hosting Plans Under $25 for Your First Year

List Web Hosting offer USD5 Monthly or USD50 Annually

Finding web hosting that meets your criteria of USD 5 monthly or USD 50 annually or lower for the initial term is very common, especially with introductory offers for Shared Web Hosting.

Here is a list of well-known web hosting providers that frequently offer plans at or below your specified price point for the initial subscription period (often requiring a longer-term commitment like 12, 24, or 48 months to get the lowest price):

Web HostIntroductory Price Range (Per Month)Common Annual Initial Cost (Approx.)Key Detail
Hostinger$1.99 to $2.99As low as $24−$36One of the cheapest on long-term introductory plans. Excellent value.
IONOS$1.00 to $3.00As low as $12 for the first yearOften has a very low first-year price, which may be significantly lower than $50.
DreamHost$2.59 to $2.95As low as $31−$36Officially recommended by WordPress. Known for a 97-day money-back guarantee.
InterServer$2.50 (often locked-in price)$30Known for a “Price Lock” guarantee.
Namecheap$1.58 to $2.98As low as $19−$36Very popular for affordable pricing, domains, and hosting.
HostGator$2.29 to $3.95As low as $27−$47Offers reliable shared hosting plans.
GreenGeeks$2.95 to $4.95As low as $35−$59Focuses on eco-friendly, green energy web hosting.
InMotion Hosting$2.29 to $4.49As low as $27−$54Often includes a free domain and good customer support.
DigitalOcean (Droplets/VPS)Starting at $4.00N/A (Cloud/VPS pricing)Great for developers and technical users looking for a budget VPS (Virtual Private Server) instead of shared hosting.

Export to Sheets

Important Considerations:

  • Introductory vs. Renewal Price: The very low prices (like $1.99/mo or $12/year) are almost always promotional rates for new customers and require a multi-year contract (e.g., 24 or 48 months). Be sure to check the renewal price, as it will almost always be higher (often $6 to $12 per month).
  • Annual vs. Multi-Year: To meet the ≤$50 annual threshold, you will usually need to sign up for a multi-year plan (e.g., 2-4 years) to bring the average monthly cost down low enough.
  • Billing Cycle: The final annual or monthly cost will depend heavily on the billing cycle you choose (e.g., 1 month, 12 months, 48 months).
  • Features: Always verify the included features like storage space (SSD/NVMe is faster), bandwidth, free domain registration, free SSL certificates, and email accounts, as these can vary significantly between the cheapest plans.
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on List Web Hosting offer USD5 Monthly or USD50 Annually

Only $50 Deal per Year to Get Unlimited Inodes Web Hosting at CreemHost.com

In the world of budget web hosting, the promise of “unlimited” usually comes with a silent asterisk: limited resources. It’s a common complaint: the moment your website sees real traffic, performance tanks, your site slows down, and you find yourself facing an unexpected resource suspension.

But what if a relatively new player is challenging this unspoken pact? Enter CreemHost, a hosting provider operating with a lean, performance-first philosophy, offering a shared hosting package that explicitly guarantees the two most critical components of speed—CPU and RAM—for just $50 annually.

This is the story of how CreemHost is delivering what many consider an impossible combination: aggressive pricing and assured performance.

Angle 1: The Value and Shock Factor (Focus on Price vs. Performance)

  1. $50 a Year Gets You 2 CPU / 2 GB RAM? CreemHost Just Broke Shared Hosting.
  2. Stop Getting Throttled: CreemHost Offers Guaranteed Power for the Price of a Dinner Out.
  3. The Budget Hosting Secret: Unlocking 2 CPU + Unlimited Inodes for Just $4.17/Month.
  4. Is CreemHost the Best Budget Host on Earth? Only $50/Year for Unthinkable Specs.

Angle 2: The Resource Solution (Focus on Solving Common Hosting Complaints)

  1. Tired of Shared Hosting Limits? CreemHost Says NO to Throttling with 2 CPU Cores.
  2. The Inode Limit Is Dead: Why CreemHost’s $50 Plan Gives You True Unlimited Growth.
  3. Shared Hosting Without the Headaches: Guaranteed 2 GB RAM (No More Slowdowns).
  4. Finally, Shared Hosting That Works: CreemHost’s Secret to Complaint-Less Performance.

Angle 3: The Direct & Bold Claim (Focus on the Specific, Hard-to-Believe Specs)

  1. CreemHost’s $50 Deal: The Only Shared Host With Explicit 2 CPU / 2 GB RAM.
  2. The Unbeatable NVMe Speed: Why You Should Pay Only $50/Year for CreemHost’s Pro Plan.

The key differentiator in CreemHost’s Pro Plus Plan is the clarity of its hardware specifications. While most providers keep their shared hosting resources vague, the Pro Plus plan boldly advertises: 2 CPU Cores and 2 GB RAM.

For those unfamiliar with hosting jargon, this is a revolutionary move in the shared hosting space. Standard budget shared plans often share resources among dozens or hundreds of users, meaning your site gets a tiny fraction of a core and a fraction of a GB of RAM, which can be throttled at any moment.

By explicitly reserving 2 CPU Cores and 2 GB of RAM for your account, CreemHost is, in essence, selling a mini-VPS (Virtual Private Server) at a shared hosting price. This guaranteed allocation is the secret weapon to running a website that is truly “complaint less”. It allows your site to:

  1. Handle Traffic Spikes: Your server won’t buckle during a sudden rush of visitors.
  2. Multitask Efficiently: Complex operations like WooCommerce checkout, image processing, and database queries run smoothly.
  3. Ensure Speed: When coupled with their high-speed NVMe storage, the dedicated CPU and RAM translate directly into fast page loading times, a crucial factor for Google search rankings.

Unlimited Inodes: The Forgotten Barrier

Beyond raw speed, the second major headache for growing websites is the Inode Limit. An inode is simply a data structure that stores information about a file, folder, or email. Every file counts as one inode. For budget hosts, a common practice is to cap inodes at 200,000 or 300,000 to prevent a few customers from hoarding millions of tiny files, such as email archives or cached WordPress versions. Hitting this limit means you cannot upload any new files, regardless of how much storage space you have left.

CreemHost’s solution? Unlimited Inodes.

For a site owner running a large WordPress installation, multiple e-commerce sites, or a photography portfolio, this feature removes a significant growth constraint. Combined with their generous offer of unlimited hosted websites on the Pro Plus plan, CreemHost is positioning itself as a legitimate option for developers and agencies looking for a reliable, no-limits foundation for multiple projects.

The Global Origin and Operational Status

The CreemHost story is one of global reach built from local efficiency. Established with a UK company registration, the provider’s operational roots and primary focus are in Pakistan. This dual structure hints at a strategy to leverage operational efficiencies outside of high-cost Western markets while maintaining formal legal standing in a global business hub.

  • Operational History: Based on customer reviews, CreemHost has been active since 2019/2020, giving it several years of experience and track record in the competitive hosting market.
  • Customer Base and Datacenters: Like many focused providers, CreemHost is lean on marketing fanfare. Information regarding their total number of users or hosted websites is not publicly disclosed, nor are the locations of their datacenters (US, Europe, Asia, etc.). While this lack of transparency can be frustrating for some, the company appears to prioritize investing resources into the hardware and licensed software (like cPanel and Imunify360) that directly benefit performance, rather than large-scale PR or marketing campaigns.

The Verdict: A New Type of Value

The CreemHost model, centered around the $50 annual Pro Plus plan, forces a re-evaluation of shared hosting value.

For users who have suffered through endless throttling and hidden file limitations on major platforms, CreemHost’s explicit guarantee of 2 CPU Cores and 2 GB RAM alongside unlimited inodes is a compelling promise. It shifts the conversation from a gamble on “unlimited” capacity to a guarantee of tangible performance, making it one of the most resource-rich budget hosting options available today. The mystery of the datacenters and the company’s low profile are the price paid for getting premium resources at a price point that is genuinely hard to beat.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Only $50 Deal per Year to Get Unlimited Inodes Web Hosting at CreemHost.com

Free Backlinks from Website DR 80+

Website Domain Rating DR84:

That’s an excellent and very specific question! The short answer is: yes, but not for the SEO reason you might think, and their value is limited compared to other link types.

Here’s a breakdown of why a blog comment backlink from a high-authority site (like DR80+) is still valid, but with a big asterisk:


1. The “NoFollow” Factor is Key

The vast majority of blog comment links, especially on high-authority websites, are tagged as “nofollow,” “ugc” (User-Generated Content), or “sponsored.”

  • What this means: These tags tell search engines (like Google) not to pass on the full “link juice” (PageRank or authority) to your site. They are essentially a suggestion to the search engine to discount the link for ranking purposes.
  • What this doesn’t mean: Google has stated that they treat “nofollow” and “ugc” as hints, not directives, but for the most part, a comment link is unlikely to directly boost your Domain Rating or significantly improve your organic search rankings.

2. The Real Value: Traffic, Branding, and Diversification

So if they don’t pass a lot of SEO value, what’s the point of targeting a high-DR site?

  • Referral Traffic: A comment on a high-DR site means that site gets a lot of visitors. If you leave a genuinely thoughtful, insightful comment that includes a link to a relevant resource on your site, you can drive targeted, qualified traffic directly to your page. This is arguably the most valuable benefit.
  • Brand Awareness & Authority: Having your name/brand appear on an authority site, even in the comments, exposes you to a new, relevant audience. It helps establish you as a contributor in your niche.
  • Link Profile Diversification: A healthy, “natural” backlink profile should consist of a mix of “dofollow” and “nofollow” links from various sources (guest posts, resource pages, social media, comments, etc.). A few high-quality, relevant comment links contribute to this natural mix.

3. Best Practices for Blog Comments

If you decide to pursue this strategy, focus on quality over quantity:

  1. Relevance: Only comment on blogs that are highly relevant to your niche.
  2. Genuine Engagement: Don’t post generic comments like “Great post!” Write a thoughtful reply, add a unique perspective, or ask a follow-up question.
  3. Natural Linking: Only include your link when it genuinely supports or adds context to your comment. Avoid keyword-stuffed anchor text and use your real name or brand name instead.
  4. Prioritize DoFollow (If Available): Some niche, smaller, or older blogs may still offer “dofollow” links in the comments. While harder to find, these are the only ones that will offer direct SEO benefit.

The takeaway is this: A blog comment backlink on a DR80+ site is valid for driving traffic and improving brand visibility, but it is not a primary link building strategy for boosting SEO authority and organic rankings.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Free Backlinks from Website DR 80+

Reviw GoogieHost “Lifetime Hosting” plan details

Based on the GoogieHost “Lifetime Hosting” plan details and public user reviews, here is the information regarding technical specifications and common user complaints:


1. GoogieHost Lifetime Hosting Features

The official lifetime hosting page provides details on storage, bandwidth, and uptime, but does not explicitly list specific CPU core counts or dedicated RAM for the plans, which is typical for shared hosting environments.

FeatureStart Plan ($25 Lifetime)Grow Plan ($50 Lifetime)Enterprise Plan ($100 Lifetime)
CPU / RAMNot Explicitly Listed (Implied shared resources)Not Explicitly Listed (Implied shared resources)Not Explicitly Listed (Implied shared resources)
Storage10 GB NVMe SSD50 GB NVMe SSD100 GB NVMe SSD
InodesNot Explicitly Listed (A major point of user complaint—see below)Not Explicitly ListedNot Explicitly Listed
Uptime99.95% Uptime Guarantee99.95% Uptime Guarantee99.95% Uptime Guarantee
BandwidthUnmetered BandwidthUnmetered BandwidthUnmetered Bandwidth
Control PanelCyberPanelCyberPanelCyberPanel
WebsitesHost 3 WebsitesHost 10 WebsitesHost Unlimited Websites

Export to Sheets

Important Feature Notes:

  • NVMe SSD: All plans use NVMe SSD storage for faster performance.
  • Payment Model: The plans are offered as a one-time payment for a “lifetime” service.

2. Common User Complaints and Issues

User reviews and complaints, particularly concerning GoogieHost’s free and paid services (including lifetime deals), often highlight significant concerns regarding reliability, support, and resource limits:

A. Reliability and Resource Limits

  • Downtime: Despite the advertised high uptime guarantee (99.95%), a significant number of users report frequent and extended periods of downtime, with sites being inaccessible intermittently or down for days.
  • Inode Limit: Users frequently complain about account suspensions due to allegedly exceeding the inode limit, even when their usage appeared low. The specific inode limit for the plans is generally not transparent, which leads to sudden service termination.
  • PHP/Feature Disabling: Some users reported that key scripting features, like PHP, were unexpectedly disabled on their servers, severely limiting website functionality.

B. Support and Business Concerns

  • Poor Customer Support: The most common complaint is that the support is slow, unresponsive, or non-existent. Users often receive generic, canned replies, and support tickets may be closed without the issue being resolved.
  • Account Termination/Data Loss: Multiple users reported that their accounts, including sites on “Lifetime Hosting” plans, were abruptly shut down and deleted without warning, resulting in a complete loss of website data.
  • “Lifetime” Viability: Industry and user consensus warns that “Lifetime Hosting” models are often unsustainable and can lead to companies closing down or forcing migrations after a short period, leaving customers without service or data.
  • Reseller Confusion: The company has been noted in reviews as possibly being a reseller for other hosting providers, which can add a layer of complexity to technical issues and support.
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Reviw GoogieHost “Lifetime Hosting” plan details

Wow! Register .Com only USD4 at Dreamhost.com

That’s an excellent breakdown of DreamHost’s domain pricing!

It highlights a key factor to look at when comparing hosts: the total cost of ownership, which includes the domain and its renewal.

Here is a comparison of DreamHost’s .COM domain pricing versus Verpex’s offering:

ProviderFirst-Year .COM PriceRenewal .COM PriceKey Domain Feature
DreamHost$4.99 (Sale)$19.99FREE WHOIS Privacy for life.
VerpexFREE (on annual/long-term hosting plans)Renewal price not explicitly stated, but often around the industry average.Free Domain Registration/Transfer is included with annual plans for popular TLDs like .com, .net, .org.

You are correct. The table formatting in the previous response was lost due to the way the information was presented outside of a proper table block.

Here is the corrected and properly formatted table comparing registrars with low introductory prices for a .COM domain:

RegistrarTypical Promo Price (First Year)Standard Renewal PriceKey Feature to Consider
DreamHost$4.99$19.99FREE WHOIS Privacy for life.
GoDaddy$0.99 to $4.99 (Often requires 2+ years or a coupon)$20.00 – $22.00+Free basic domain privacy for life (on some plans).
IONOS (1&1)$1.00$15.00 – $20.00Extremely low initial price; often requires purchasing a hosting plan.
Namecheap$6.49 to $8.88 (Sometimes lower with a special code)$13.48 – $15.00+Not typically under $5, but their renewal price is often one of the lowest.
VerpexFREE (Included with annual hosting plans)Varies; typically near the industry average for renewal.Domain is free for the first year if you buy hosting.

A first-year price of $4.99 or less for a .com is a very common promotional deal. These prices are almost always for new customers/first year only, and the subsequent renewal price is what you need to watch out for.

Here are the places where users can typically find a .com domain for around $4 to $5 for the first year, focusing on the common registrars that run these “loss leader” promotions.

Other header

High-Impact/Urgency Titles

These focus on the shockingly low price and the limited-time nature of the deal.

  1. Stop Scrolling! Get a .COM Domain for Just $1.00 at IONOS.
  2. The $4.99 .COM is BACK! Register Yours Now at DreamHost.
  3. Hurry! This Registrar is Giving Away .COM Domains for Under $5.
  4. Wait, What? Secure a .COM for Less Than a Cup of Coffee!
  5. Don’t Pay $20! Here’s the Secret $4.99 .COM Registrar.

Benefit-Driven/Problem-Solving Titles

These focus on how easy or cheap it is to start a website.

  1. Your Website is Waiting: Launch Your .COM for Under $5 Today.
  2. The Smart Way to Start: Best .COM Deals That Won’t Break the Bank.
  3. Finally! Affordable .COM Domain Registration (No Hidden Fees… Yet).
  4. $4.99 and Done: How to Get Your .COM from GoDaddy (The Real Steps).
  5. Want FREE Domain Privacy? Get a Cheap .COM at NameSilo.

List-Style/Guide Titles

These promise a comprehensive resource or comparison.

  1. The Ultimate List of .COM Domains Under $5 (2025 Deals).
  2. The 3 Cheapest Places to Register a .COM This Month (Starting at $1).
  3. DreamHost vs. GoDaddy: Which $4.99 .COM Deal is Actually Better?
  4. Warning: The Hidden Cost of a $4.99 .COM (And Where to Find the Best Renewal).
  5. Only Pay Wholesale: The Secret Registrar with a $9.95 .COM Renewal. (For Cloudflare)

Clickbait-Style/Intrigue Titles

These generate curiosity by being provocative.

  1. Why Are They Selling .COM Domains for Only $1? (The Truth About IONOS).
  2. I Found a .COM for $0.99—But You Need to Know This First.
  3. Exposed: The Biggest Domain Scam (And The Only Cheap Registrar I Trust).
  4. Stop Paying $20/Year! Switch Your .COM to This $15 Registrar. (For Namecheap)
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Wow! Register .Com only USD4 at Dreamhost.com

Dreamhost.com Unlimited VS Verpex.com Gold Web

So i have visited cheap web hosting and unlimited webhost of Dreamhost.com and verpex.com

here the comparison :

This is a comparison between the Verpex Gold shared hosting plan and the two main DreamHost shared hosting plans (Shared Starter and Shared Unlimited), focusing on the resources and speed features you requested (CPU, RAM, and Server Speed Technology).

DreamHost does not clearly list the specific CPU (vCPU) or RAM (LVE Memory Limit) resources allocated to their shared hosting plans like Verpex does. However, we can compare the resources based on their core offerings and speed-enhancing technologies.

Shared Hosting Plan Comparison

FeatureVerpex GoldDreamHost Shared StarterDreamHost Shared Unlimited
CPU (vCores)2 vCPU CoresShared (Specific vCPU not specified)Shared (Specific vCPU not specified)
RAM (Memory Limit)2 GB LVE Memory LimitShared (Specific RAM not specified)Shared (Specific RAM not specified)
Server Speed TechNVMe SSD Storage, LiteSpeed Webserver, PHP Opcode CacheFast SSD StorageFast SSD Storage
Web ServerLiteSpeed (Generally faster than Apache)Apache (Standard shared environment)Apache (Standard shared environment)
Storage100GB NVMe SSD50GB SSDUnlimited SSD
WebsitesUnlimited1Unlimited
Email @ Your DomainUnlimitedAvailable for PurchaseIncluded
DatabasesUnlimited6Unlimited

Export to Sheets

Analysis

1. Performance and Speed (CPU, RAM, Server Speed)

CategoryWinner/ComparisonRationale
CPU & RAMVerpex GoldVerpex specifies dedicated resource limits (2 vCPU, 2GB RAM), which provides a clear performance baseline. DreamHost only specifies “Shared Resources,” meaning the exact guaranteed power is not disclosed, which is typical for many budget shared hosts.
Storage TechnologyVerpex GoldVerpex explicitly uses NVMe SSD storage, which is significantly faster than the standard SSD storage listed by DreamHost, leading to better overall site speed (especially Time To First Byte).
Web ServerVerpex GoldVerpex uses LiteSpeed Webserver, which is architecturally superior and generally much faster at serving content than the Apache-based environment typically used by DreamHost.

Export to Sheets

Conclusion on Performance: Based on the disclosed technical specifications, the Verpex Gold plan appears to offer superior speed and performance stability due to the combination of LiteSpeed, NVMe SSDs, and guaranteed 2GB of RAM/2 vCPU Cores.

2. Features and Scalability

CategoryWinner/ComparisonRationale
Number of SitesTie (Gold/Unlimited)Both Verpex Gold and DreamHost Shared Unlimited allow for an unlimited number of websites and databases.
Storage SizeDreamHost Shared UnlimitedDreamHost offers Unlimited SSD storage on their Unlimited plan, while Verpex Gold is capped at 100GB NVMe SSD.
EmailDreamHost Shared UnlimitedDreamHost includes Unlimited Email accounts at your domain, whereas Verpex also includes unlimited emails. (It’s a feature parity point, but DreamHost makes a bigger distinction on their plan comparison).

Export to Sheets

Final Takeaway:

  • If your priority is raw performance, speed, and guaranteed resources, the Verpex Gold plan is the stronger choice due to its specified CPU/RAM limits, LiteSpeed, and NVMe technology.
  • If your priority is the absolute maximum limit on storage and sites without concern for guaranteed CPU/RAM limits, the DreamHost Shared Unlimited plan is competitive, offering truly unlimited SSD disk space.

Read more

That’s an insightful observation, and it touches on a common point of frustration for consumers in the shared hosting market. The difference in transparency often comes down to the business model and technology being sold:

The “Shared” Hosting Philosophy: Verpex vs. DreamHost

1. Verpex’s “LVE” Transparency (Better for Performance-Focused Users)

Verpex’s decision to list 2 vCPU Cores and 2GB LVE Memory Limit is a move toward resource isolation and transparency.

  • LVE (Lightweight Virtual Environment): This technology, typically provided by CloudLinux, is designed to strictly limit the CPU, RAM, and I/O resources any single shared hosting account can consume.
  • The Benefit: By listing these limits, Verpex is essentially making a performance guarantee. You know exactly the minimum power your site will always have, and that other “bad neighbor” sites cannot steal those resources, which is much more frank about what you are getting.

2. DreamHost’s “Unlimited/Shared” Philosophy (Better for Simplicity/Beginners)

DreamHost, like many larger, older shared hosting providers, focuses on simplicity and “unlimited” features, which often means being less frank about the underlying technical limits.

  • “Shared” Resources: When DreamHost lists resources as “Shared,” it means you are sharing the entire physical server’s CPU and RAM with many other users. There is no fixed, guaranteed slice.
  • The Implicit Limit: While DreamHost doesn’t specify the vCPU/RAM, they have internal limits (often called “acceptable usage policies”) to ensure one site doesn’t crash the server for everyone else. If your site’s usage exceeds this unlisted, dynamic threshold, they will ask you to upgrade to a VPS plan, where they do list the specific CPU and RAM.
    • DreamHost’s VPS: The search results confirm that DreamHost does list protected vCPU cores and RAM when you buy a VPS plan, precisely because that is the point where they guarantee resource isolation.
  • The “Unlimited” Gimmick: The “Unlimited SSD Storage” is also a common marketing term. While you won’t be charged for storage up to a point, the “unlimited” usage is restricted by the acceptable usage policy, often targeting sites that use the service for storage/backup rather than actual website files.

Conclusion on Fairness and Frankness

You are correct that Verpex is more frank about performance limitations by listing the LVE resources, which is preferable for users who understand resource management.

However, DreamHost’s model is typical of a broad-market shared host. While less frank about performance, they offer Simplicity and Unlimited features on the assumption that most small, low-traffic sites will never hit those limits, which is what many beginners want.

In summary:

  • Verpex: Frank about performance limits (2 vCPU, 2GB RAM) and the faster technology (LiteSpeed, NVMe).
  • DreamHost: Less frank about resource limits, prioritizing the marketing of “Unlimited” features and low starting price, but relying on the fact that the vast majority of shared hosting users don’t need dedicated resources.
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Dreamhost.com Unlimited VS Verpex.com Gold Web